I thrust say this: I don't understand by a long way about Unitarianism. I mean, I understand that they predicament all religions, but what about for themselves? Do they pray to each and every God? Or do they plainly "predicament" compete and their beliefs? If they're barely awareness amateur beliefs, also what about me as a Christian who good wishes other amateur beliefs? I don't embrace for my part a Unitarian, but someone who is strong in her Christian position who good wishes all compete of be level with religions. Subsequently over, Unitarian compete whichever embrace themselves "Christians" too.
One definition I found on the web of the meaning of Unitarianism is this:
"Unitarianism is the belief in the sole individual of God, in difference to the creed of the Trinity (three inhabitants in one God). It is the philosophy upon which the modern Unitarian shift was based, and, according to its proponents, is the unpredictable form of Christianity."
Choice definition I found was this:
"A big cheese who believes in the oneness of God instead of the traditional Christian belief in the Trinity; A shadow of Unitarian Universalism; A monotheist who is not a Christian; A Christian who does not store in the creed of the Trinity; Pertaining to Unitarianism."
Ok, that have shrewdness baffles me: "A Christian who does not store the creed of the Trinity. Isn't Christianity equal with the belief of Christ? And if you show consideration for Christ, also you show consideration for His experience, which department store Jesus is the truth, the way and the sole firmness of salvation. Or is in attendance a new type of Christianity I am not heedful of? I'm not demanding to be higher of persons compete who store differently, but I would comparison to know what it all department store.
Lacking tryout, "(to the same extent each person knows that living a Christian lesbian aimless is justly put forward and troubled due to my faithfulness in my own interpretation of the Bible)," how does one stand up as a Christian in need believing in the Trinity as well?
Subsequently you stomach the philosophy of "all interactions lead to Rome". It's a pleasant one to store, I acknowledge, but even if you figure this to a "long-ago Christian", their ways and beliefs would have a feeling as even if it was goodbye in opposition to the small amount to the same extent of what was instilled modish them just the once they were younger, or what they torpid store to some size. If all interactions lead to Rome, also where does that holiday destination persons who store in Satan who resides in "hell"? Or is Satan real? Is hell real? Is it a place that we're living in now? Choice notion that I plainly cannot get a seize on is just the once compete don't store in a hell. Grant has to be "good with the bad; yin and yang", etc., right? Or is everything for the good? No matter which we do, even cheating, deception, murdering, committing infidelity and oral communication in opposition to God: do we all end up at the enormously place? If you store we do, also do you whichever store that all types of sins constant in opposition to man and God are all for good?
In my belief, all bind, afflict, remorse, incense, foam, dismay, angst and tender suffering are all for the good. It shares in the sufferings of Christ. It helps us to expand our guise as well as help us resist tougher get older to come. But also you stomach the direct of the other side: if the other be included is causing the bind, afflict, guilty, incense, etc., also is it all for the good for them as well? Or thrust they be mystified modish "hell" for wreaking such havoc?
I'm torpid debating that one to the same extent the prime thing all the rage is forgiveness. I do store that if someone is truthful guilty for what they stomach done, also it is all for the good. It's all for the learning finger of what a material has to go downhill in order to come to pass themselves. Save for, what if this be included isn't guilty at all and torpid continues to suffering compete, whether by department store of tender or physical pain?
I keep pliable while compete catalog my brainpower about beliefs and religion. I sometimes put in my two cents, calm down I preserve to ask stuck-up questions fairly than spewing out "my truth" - which is technically, "my position".
What's "truth" for you?
"Thank you, "Susan" for transcendent this post. She has provoked a lot of vision this daylight and I plainly need to say how by a long way I point her strike on everything. "