I. THE Medication OF THE Loatheness OF Religious studies AND THE NINE ROMAN ECUMENICAL COUNCILSAND THE General Clerical COUNCILS Having the status of 1453.
1. Religious studies is a neurobiological complaint with a fussy action which has been handed down by the prophets and apostles of the Old and New Testaments and sealed by the Fathers of the Clerical whose tradition of action was defended by the Nine Roman Ecumenical Councils. These Councils were convened by the Roman Queen, beginning with Constantine the Stout, in orderliness with the Roman Patriarchates of Above Rome, New Rome, Alexandria, Antioch and most recently Jerusalem by 451. These Councils are (1) Nicea 325, (2) Constantinople 381, (3) Ephesus 431, (4) Chalcedon 451, (5) Constantinople 553, (6) Constantinople 680, (7) Nicea 786/7, (8) Constantinople 879 and (9) Constantinople 1341. We brandish into Eight Ecumenical Councils which were promulgated as Roman Law by the dedication of the Queen in the wake of their account had been signed by the Five Roman Patriarchates and their Metropolitans and bishops. As a consequence we brandish the Ninth Ecumenical Executive committee of 1341, whose account were signed by distinct Four Roman Patriarchates and countersigned by the Roman Queen. Ancient history was now the Patriarchate of Above Rome which had been insolently captured by the Franks, Lombards, Germans and with the help of the Normans. This seize began in intensity in 983 and was consummated in 1009-1046. After 1045 the Popes of Rome, prevent for Benedict X (1058-9), were no longer Romans, but members of the Franco-Latin reputation who confined the Roman population. At the time of the Direct of 1789 the Gallo-Roman slave population of France was 85 % of the tighten up.
2. The command of the Roman Development had come to notice that religion is a complaint whose action was the dishonorable and publicize of the Christian tradition they had been persecuting. These erudite Roman leaders distorted their policy having realized that this action ought be sincere by as profuse Roman inhabit as possible. Led by Constantine the Stout, Roman leaders adopted this action in astute the extraordinarily way that today's governments seize modern tonic in order to protect their inhabit from impostor doctors. But in this set what was most likely as germane as the action was the boulevard of inspirational smash with inhabit who were replacing the ghoulish chase for elation with the altruistic love of glorification (theosis) eager to the modest good.
3. The acquaint with theory among profuse Up front that an Ecumenical Executive committee becomes most recently permitted in the same way as it is credited by a resultant Ecumenical Executive committee has no box in Roman Law. Respectively such Executive committee became Roman law the while in the same way as its account were signed on the see to it that by the participating Patriarchal and Municipality Synods and countersigned by the Queen himself. Heretics and their heresies were condemned on the see to it that and not at a resultant Ecumenical Executive committee. Their Creeds and Horoi became Roman law on the see to it that. The Code of belief of 381 became the Up front Code of belief on the see to it that in 381 and not in 431 which effortlessly unbroken the Code of belief of 381 as did each resultant Ecumenical Executive committee.
4. The Queen convened these Ecumenical Councils in conjunction with the Five Roman Patriarchates of a) Above Rome, b) Constantinople New Rome, c) Alexandria, d) Antioch to which e) Jerusalem was luxury in 451. But in the company of 1009 and 1046 the Franco-Germans bent a solid defining moment in this Roman tradition in the same way as they captured and took glossed the Patriarchate of Above Rome trendy a seize which began in 983 and was consummated in 1009. The Patriarchate of Constantinople New Rome was obliged to sphere the place of Above Rome in the order of "Seniority of Go on" which she thought legitimately agreeably such as 451 "such as with and in the wake of Rome," having become New Rome in 330.
5. Present-day are no primacies nor primates according to Roman Up front Belief Law, but distinct bishops with "Seniority of Go on" such as all bishops are doctrinally equivalent. The Franco-Latin and Protestant translations of "Seniority of mercifulness" by "occurrence of mercifulness" is theirs, not ours.
II. CHARLEMAGNE CONDEMNED THE ROMAN Development AS Heretical AND GREEK IN 794 AND 809. HIS Alleged GREEK Development WAS Ended Dead Trendy A Obsession Development BY THE BRITISH, FRENCH AND RUSSIAN EMPIRES AS Example OF THEIR Strategy FOR BALKANIZATION OF THE EUROPEAN Example OF THE OTTOMAN Development While Unique CALLED 'THE Roost OF THE ROMANS' I.E. ROUMELI.
6. Charlemagne condemned the Romans as heretics on the pressure of Icons and as "Greeks" (the subsequent meaning pagan at the time) at his Executive committee of Frankfurt in 794, unquestionably in the presence of the legates of Pope Hadrian the staunch comrade of the Seventh Ecumenical Executive committee on Icons. Charlemagne unbroken his criticism of the Romans, now persona called "Greeks," and unflustered meaning pagan such as 794, at his Executive committee of Aachen in 809. Usher it or not, this inefficient barbarian had the belief to harm the Romans as heretics for refusing to cherish his Filioque which he had luxury to the Roman Code of belief which had been pleasant at the Roman End Ecumenical Executive committee by some of the note Fathers of the Clerical in 381. At the time Charlemagne's assumed specialists knew not one Advantage of an Ecumenical Executive committee. They knew distinct the writings of Augustine who had never affected a Advantage of an Ecumenical Executive committee. Yet, the Filioque of Augustine, what that of Ambrose, is in any set Up front. But it cannot be used in the fussy belief of 381 for instance present-day the request profile style the hypostatic being of the Consecrated Specter, time in the West Roman Up front Filioque profile of the Consecrated Specter from the Advantage and Son style 'communion' of the uncreated modest force. In the Code of belief of 381 the request profile style distinct 'hypostatic being.'
III. ROMAN Obedience After 1453
7. After the Roman Queen and Development level in 1453 the Four Roman Patriarchates of Constantinople New Rome, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem continued to call upon Clerical Councils which continued the tradition of the Ecumenical Councils. The distinct reckon why these Councils are not called "Ecumenical" is effortlessly that this reputation style "Assert" such as the decisions of these Ecumenical Councils became part of Roman Law. In other words the decisions of the Roman Councils in the wake of 1453 are part of Clerical Law, but no longer part of Assert law. Present-day was no longer a Roman Development and Roman Queen to enact Roman law. So these Nine Ecumenical Councils are at the extraordinarily time both Clerical Law and Roman Law. The Councils convened in the wake of 1453 are part of Clerical Law and with no less trendsetter than Ecumenical Councils, prevent in the image of modern Up front misled by the Russian Obedience of Peter the Stout.
8. So present-day are now Up front who even called themselves the Clerical of the Seven Ecumenical Councils. Most Up front are in a identify of limbo about the Eighth and Ninth Ecumenical Councils. The Eighth Ecumenical Executive committee of 879 effortlessly condemned folks who either "add to" or "capture from" the Code of belief of 381 and also folks who brandish not yet sincere the teaching of the Seventh Ecumenical Executive committee about Icons. The Franks condemned were not mentioned at the time in order to allow them to re-examine.
9. The Ninth Ecumenical Executive committee of 1341 condemned the Platonic religious studies of Barlaam the Calabrian who had come from the West as a revolve to Obedience. Of course the refusal of a Platonic type of religious studies was traditional practice for the Fathers. But what the Fathers of this Executive committee were no question horror-struck at was Barlaam's swear that God reveals His character by bringing at home living creatures to be seen and heard and which He passes back at home non living in the wake of His dig has been expected. One of these held creatures was the Angel of the Lady Himself Who appeared to Moses in the aflame bush. For the Fathers of the Ecumenical Councils this Angel is the uncreated Logos Himself. This outrageous nonsense of Barlaam turned out to be that of Augustine himself (see e.g. his "De Tinitate", Books A and B) and of the whole Franco-Latin tradition farmhouse today.
10. The legitimate acts of Ecumenical Councils were taken within the context that religion is a complaint with a fussy action. The following aspect of the decisions of Clerical Councils can be compared to what modern states are action with medical science and aligned fields. Internal such a context heretics are to be compared with impostor doctors who self-confidence action but do not carry out. From this situation heretics are effortlessly impostor doctors. The reckon that Catholics and Protestants do not understand this Roman tradition is that they are impostor doctors themselves what supreme Up front today. For these three groups heresies are seemingly experience which are not biblical effortlessly for instance they do not determined with their set Augustinian understanding of Scripture and Practice. Terribly this is true about profuse, if not supreme, Up front assumed Biblical scholars today.
